Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

Personal tools

Sections
You are here: Home / Publications / 2017

2017

The Affinity of the S9.6 Antibody for Double-Stranded RNAs Impacts the Accurate Mapping of R-Loops in Fission Yeast.

Author(s) : Hartono S, Malapert A, Legros P, Bernard P, Chedin F, Vanoosthuyse V,
Journal : J Mol Biol
2017
R-loops, which result from the formation of stable DNA:RNA hybrids, can both threaten genome integrity and act as physiological regulators of gene expressionand chromatin patterning. To characterize R-loops in fission yeast, we used the S9.6 antibody-based DRIPc-seq method to sequence the RNA strand of R-loops and obtain strand-specific R-loop maps at near nucleotide resolution. Surprisingly, preliminary DRIPc-seq experiments identified mostly RNase H-resistant but exosome-sensitive RNAs that mapped to both DNA strands and resembled RNA:RNA hybrids (dsRNAs), suggesting that dsRNAs form widely in fission yeast. We confirmed in vitro that S9.6 can immuno-precipitate dsRNAs and provide evidence that dsRNAs can interfere with its binding to R-loops. dsRNA elimination by RNase III treatment prior to DRIPc-seq allowed the genome-wide and strand-specific identification of genuine R-loops that responded in vivo to RNase H levels and displayed classical features associated with R-loop formation. We also found that most transcripts whose levels were altered by in vivo manipulation of RNase H levels did not form detectable R-loops, suggesting that prolonged manipulation of R-loop levels could indirectly alter the transcriptome. We discuss the implications of our work in the design of experimental strategies to probe R-loop functions.

The C. elegans SET-2/SET1 histone H3 Lys4 (H3K4) methyltransferase preserves genome stability in the germline.

Author(s) : Herbette M, Mercier M, Michal F, Cluet D, Burny C, Yvert G, Robert V, Palladino F,
Journal : DNA Repair (Amst)
2017
Maintaining the integrity of genetic information across generations is essentialfor both cell survival and reproduction, and requires the timely repair of DNA damage. Histone-modifying enzymes play a central role in the DNA repair process through the deposition and removal of post-translational modifications on the histone tails. Specific histone modification act in the DNA repair process through the recruitment of proteins and complexes with specific enzymatic activities, or by altering the chromatin state at the site of DNA lesions. The conserved SET1/MLL family of histone methyltransferases (HMT) catalyzes methylation of histone H3 on Lysine 4 (H3K4), a histone modification universallyassociated with actively transcribed genes. Studies have focused on the role of SET1/MLL proteins in epigenetic regulation of gene expression. Much less is known on their role in the DNA repair process in a developmental context. Here we showthat SET-2, the Caenorhabditis elegans orthologue of SET1, is required to preserve germline genome integrity over subsequent generations. Animals lacking the SET-2 catalytic subunit show a transgenerational increase in sensitivity to DNA damage-inducing agents that is accompanied by a defect in double-strand break (DSB) repair and chromosome fragmentation. These defects are not due to a failure to activate the DNA damage response (DDR) that allows detection, signaling and repair of DNA lesions, because cell cycle arrest and apoptosis, key components of this pathway, are efficiently induced in set-2 mutant animal. Rather, our results suggest that SET-2 plays a role in the transgenerational maintenance of genome stability by acting in DNA repair downstream of DDR signaling.

The loading of condensin in the context of chromatin.

Author(s) : Robellet X, Vanoosthuyse V, Bernard P,
Journal : Curr Genet
2017
The packaging of DNA into chromosomes is a ubiquitous process that enables living organisms to structure and transmit their genome accurately through cell divisions. In the three kingdoms of life, the architecture and dynamics of chromosomes rely upon ring-shaped SMC (Structural Maintenance of Chromosomes) condensin complexes. To understand how condensin rings organize chromosomes, it is essential to decipher how they associate with chromatin filaments. Here, we use recent evidence to discuss the role played by nucleosomes and transcription factors in the loading of condensin at transcribed genes. We propose a model whereby cis-acting features nestled in the promoters of active genes synergistically attract condensin rings and promote their association with DNA.

The RNA helicase DDX5 is a reprogramming roadblock

Author(s) : Bourgeois C, Auboeuf D,
Journal : Stem Cell Investig
2017

Transcriptomic signatures shaped by cell proportions shed light on comparative developmental biology.

Author(s) : Pantalacci S, Gueguen L, Petit C, Lambert A, Peterkova R, Semon M,
Journal : Genome Biol
2017
BACKGROUND: Comparative transcriptomics can answer many questions in developmental and evolutionary developmental biology. Most transcriptomic studies start by showing global patterns of variation in transcriptomes that differ between species or organs through developmental time. However, little is known about the kinds of expression differences that shape these patterns. RESULTS: We compared transcriptomes during the development of two morphologically distinct serial organs, the upper and lower first molars of the mouse. We found that these two types of teeth largely share the same gene expression dynamics but that three major transcriptomic signatures distinguish them, all of which are shaped by differences in the relative abundance of different cell types. First, lower/upper molar differences are maintained throughout morphogenesis and stem from differences in the relative abundance of mesenchyme and from constant differences in gene expression within tissues. Second, there are clear time-shift differences in the transcriptomes of the two molars related to cusp tissue abundance. Third,the transcriptomes differ most during early-mid crown morphogenesis, corresponding to exaggerated morphogenetic processes in the upper molar involving fewer mitotic cells but more migrating cells. From these findings, we formulate hypotheses about the mechanisms enabling the two molars to reach different phenotypes. We also successfully applied our approach to forelimb and hindlimb development. CONCLUSIONS: Gene expression in a complex tissue reflects not only transcriptional regulation but also abundance of different cell types. This knowledge provides valuable insights into the cellular processes underpinning differences in organ development. Our approach should be applicable to most comparative developmental contexts.

Translational reprogramming of colorectal cancer cells induced by 5-fluorouracil through a miRNA-dependent mechanism

Author(s) : Bash-Imam Z, Th?rizols G, Vincent A, Laf?rets F, Polay Espinoza M, Pion N, Macari F, Pannequin J, David A, Saurin J, Mertani H, Textoris J, Auboeuf D, Catez F, Dalla Venezia N, Dutertre M, Marcel V, Diaz J,
Journal : Oncotarget
2017

Translational reprogramming of colorectal cancer cells induced by 5-fluorouracil through a miRNA-dependent mechanism.

Author(s) : Bash-Imam Z, Therizols G, Vincent A, Laforets F, Polay Espinoza M, Pion N, Macari F, Pannequin J, David A, Saurin J, Mertani H, Textoris J, Auboeuf D, Catez F, Dalla Venezia N, Dutertre M, Marcel V, Diaz J,
Journal : Oncotarget
2017
5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is a widely used chemotherapeutic drug in colorectal cancer. Previous studies showed that 5-FU modulates RNA metabolism and mRNA expression. In addition, it has been reported that 5-FU incorporates into the RNAs constituting the translational machinery and that 5-FU affects the amount of some mRNAs associated with ribosomes. However, the impact of 5-FU on translational regulation remains unclear. Using translatome profiling, we reportthat a clinically relevant dose of 5-FU induces a translational reprogramming incolorectal cancer cell lines. Comparison of mRNA distribution between polysomal and non-polysomal fractions in response to 5-FU treatment using microarray quantification identified 313 genes whose translation was selectively regulated.These regulations were mostly stimulatory (91%). Among these genes, we showed that 5-FU increases the mRNA translation of HIVEP2, which encodes a transcription factor whose translation in normal condition is known to be inhibited by mir-155. In response to 5-FU, the expression of mir-155 decreases thus stimulating the translation of HIVEP2 mRNA. Interestingly, the 5-FU-induced increase in specificmRNA translation was associated with reduction of global protein synthesis. Altogether, these findings indicate that 5-FU promotes a translational reprogramming leading to the increased translation of a subset of mRNAs that involves at least for some of them, miRNA-dependent mechanisms. This study supports a still poorly evaluated role of translational control in drug response.

Variations in basement membrane mechanics are linked to epithelial morphogenesis.

Author(s) : Chlasta J, Milani P, Runel G, Duteyrat J, Arias L, Lamiré L, Boudaoud A, Grammont M,
Journal : Development
2017

When mRNA translation meets decay.

Author(s) : Bicknell A, Ricci E,
Journal : Biochem Soc Trans
2017
Messenger RNA (mRNA) translation and mRNA degradation are important determinantsof protein output, and they are interconnected. Previously, it was thought that translation of an mRNA, as a rule, prevents its degradation. mRNA surveillance mechanisms, which degrade mRNAs as a consequence of their translation, were considered to be exceptions to this rule. Recently, however, it has become clearthat many mRNAs are degraded co-translationally, and it has emerged that codon choice, by influencing the rate of ribosome elongation, affects the rate of mRNAdecay. In this review, we discuss the links between translation and mRNA stability, with an emphasis on emerging data suggesting that codon optimality may regulate mRNA degradation.